SciWay reads your team's papers, protocols, ELN entries, results and decision notes, then answers questions with the exact source behind every claim. When the sources disagree, it shows both. When the answer isn't there, it says so.
What a lab tried, why it decided, and what failed lives across ELNs, email, file shares, results tables and decision notes — most of it never written down twice. General-purpose AI tools answer over this confidently even when the evidence isn't there, and rarely cite or refuse. Meanwhile Horizon Europe, DFG/NWO and NFDI now tie funding to FAIR data management, turning a lab's own memory into a budgeted requirement.
Ask a question and SciWay pulls the relevant passages from your project, classifies what it found, and shows its work — a cited answer when the evidence supports it, both sides when sources disagree, and a plain refusal when the project doesn't contain the answer.
The evidence supports it — you get the answer with the exact source quotes behind it.
Two sources disagree on a value — both are flagged with provenance, not silently merged.
The evidence is missing — it refuses, and shows you what it considered.
This runs SciWay's deterministic grounding right here in your browser — no sign-up, no API key, nothing leaves this page. The answer is a verbatim sentence from your text; ask something it doesn't cover and it refuses instead of guessing.
Bring your own documents — PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, MD, TXT, JSON or pasted text — or open the one-click sample project to explore the synthetic demo lab. Trace any claim to its source location, map concepts in the knowledge graph, share a project with your team, and export FAIR metadata.



Every capability keeps the same contract: a claim is only made if a source backs it, and that source is always one click away.
Every claim carries its source system, title, page / row / line, exact quote and link. Inspect the evidence behind any sentence.
When the evidence isn't there, SciWay abstains instead of bluffing — and shows what it considered but found insufficient. On by default.
When sources disagree on a value, both are flagged with provenance — so decisions rest on the full picture, not the first hit.
Embeddings-based search finds the right passage even when the words don't match — with a calibrated similarity floor so weak matches refuse rather than mislead.
Not just a concept map: edges are typed (supports / contradicts / decided / uses-protocol) with their own provenance, and entity mentions are linked across documents — click an edge to see the two chunks behind it.
"Has this team ever tried X before?" — a permission-aware search across every project you own or share, with the same grounded citation + refusal contract. The wedge no literature tool or single-project assistant can answer.
Assign a follow-up to a teammate with a due date, straight from an answer or a document. They get notified on assignment — the CRM gap generic RAG chatbots don't close.
Invite your team into a project with owner / editor / viewer roles. The questions you ask and the grounded answers you keep accumulate into a shared record.
Export a project's documents, saved Q&A and provenance as a citable evidence log (Markdown / JSON), plus FAIR metadata (DataCite, Dublin Core, RO-Crate).
Run answers on an EU-resident model (with PII minimization), on a local model on your own hardware, or with no LLM at all — the deterministic engine returns a verbatim cited sentence with nothing leaving the machine.
The same product, three deployment shapes — pick the one that matches how sensitive your data is.
A built-in synthetic lab to explore with zero sign-up — ask the golden questions, see the refusal and conflict states, inspect the citations.
Create an account, upload your documents into isolated projects, ask, and invite your team. Runs on EU-resident infrastructure with per-tenant isolation.
Deploy the whole stack — store, vector search, graph memory and a local LLM — onto one server inside your network. We install it and hand it off; no data ever leaves the box, and we hold no credentials to the running system.
An honest status of what's shipped, in build, and exploratory. The provenance-and-refusal contract holds at every stage.
SciWay is a venture-track prototype, and we say so. Inference is deterministic by default; any external model call is opt-in, key-gated, and PII-redacted, and can be replaced by a model on your own hardware. Bundled lab data is fully synthetic, and the demo accepts synthetic / non-PII content only. Compliance features — GDPR-aware handling, EU hosting, FAIR-aligned export — are design intent for pilots, not a certification. We'd rather under-claim and show our work.
Are you a PI, researcher, or RDM / data steward who keeps re-discovering what your team already tried? Your answers steer what we build next.
We're talking to academic and translational life-science labs and their institutions about design-partner pilots — hosted or self-hosted.
Email · hello@sciway.software
A built-in synthetic demo lab to explore with zero sign-up, plus bring-your-own projects — create an account, upload your docs, invite your team, and ask.